Case Study 2 :
Standardizing Peer Mentor Practices to Improve student acheivement
Background: A nonprofit organization running a peer mentorship program for youth aged 14–26 was committed to supporting career exploration and development. Despite strong program goals, they observed inconsistent quality in student career plans and presentations across different mentor groups. The variability was hindering equitable outcomes and program impact, prompting a need for more consistent and effective mentoring practices.
My Role:
As the learning consultant, I was responsible for diagnosing challenges within the mentorship program and designing an intervention to improve mentor effectiveness and student outcomes.
The Process
Through observations of small-group mentoring sessions, I discovered that mentors approached their role in highly inconsistent ways. Some:
Focused heavily on one section of the career plan while neglecting others.
Used timers to pace students, while others let time run unchecked.
Chunked instructions into smaller steps, while others gave large, overwhelming tasks.
Allowed productive struggle, while others over-directed and completed tasks for students.
These inconsistencies extended to session structure, pacing, and instructional approach — likely contributing to the uneven quality of student work.
Additionally, to diagnose the problem, I conducted mentor interviews, asking questions like:
How prepared did you feel for your session?
How confident are you in supporting learners with the material?
What concepts do you need help understanding?
Key findings emerged:
Varying levels of preparedness — Some mentors admitted they didn’t fully understand the material themselves.
Unclear expectations and processes — No standard approach to time management, scaffolding, or session flow.
Lack of internalization — Mentors hadn’t personally gone through the process of creating a career plan, making it harder to model and explain steps to learners.
I used a combination of analysis techniques:
Should–Is Gap Analysis – Compared the ideal learner outputs to the actual outputs to identify skill gaps.
Perception Alignment Analysis – Compared what mentors thought students should produce to organizational expectations.
High-Performer Inventory – Interviewed top-performing mentors to identify strategies contributing to higher-quality plans.
The Solution
I designed and facilitated a structured mentor training and support program to create consistency, improve mentor preparedness, and strengthen coaching skills.
Internalization Exercise – Each mentor created their own career exploration plan to better understand the steps and quality expectations.
Coaching Guide – Developed a reference document for each objective containing:
The objective and its importance.
An exemplar career plan section and rationale.
Common learner misconceptions and how to course-correct.
Scaffolded questions to support struggling learners.
Professional Development Series – Facilitated approximately six workshops over three months covering topics such as:
Creating urgency with time management tools and strategies.
Chunking complex tasks into manageable steps.
Modeling and think-aloud instructional techniques.
Additional topics tailored to ongoing mentor needs and feedback.
Coaching Rubric & Sessions – Created a detailed coaching rubric to observe and assess mentor practices during sessions. Using trends identified from observations, I led group coaching sessions focused on addressing common challenges and reinforcing effective strategies.
Impact
The initiative led to measurable improvements:
Mentor satisfaction increased significantly — from 63% of mentors reporting they felt confident and prepared before the intervention to 91% afterward.
Quality of learner outputs improved — career exploration plans scoring 80% or better increased from 52% to 76%.
Established a standardized mentoring framework, ensuring more equitable learner experiences across all small groups.
Key Deliverables
Mentor coaching guide with exemplars, rationales, pitfalls, and scaffolded prompts.
6-part professional development workshop series delivered over three months.
Detailed coaching rubric used for observations and targeted group coaching sessions.
Standardized mentoring expectations and session flow framework.